TerraNexus Scientific Journal

Related pages: Author Guidelines · Submit Manuscript · Evaluation Criteria

Manuscript Title

Manuscript Reference No.

Reviewer Name

Date of Review

Institution / Affiliation

Scoring Reference

Score Global	Decision
70–100 / 100	Accepté (Accept)
55–69 / 100	Révision mineure (Minor Revision)
40–54 / 100	Révision majeure (Major Revision)
0–39 / 100	Rejeté (Reject)

A — Scientific Content

Scientific Content

40 pts max ▲

#	Criterion	Score (0–10)
A1	Originality & Novelty (Highest weight within A)
A2	Methodological Rigor (All disciplinary approaches accepted)
A3	Data Quality & Analysis (Reliability, sufficiency, uncertainties)
A4	Literature Integration & Positioning (Global corpus — all pillars covered)
A5	Logical Flow & Structural Clarity (Problem → Method → Results → Interpretation → Conclusion)
A6	Disciplinary Relevance & Multidisciplinary Contribution (Core TerraNexus criterion — weighs double)
A7	Reproducibility & Transparency (Raw data, protocols, repositories)

Section A raw score (out of 10 avg): — / 10

Weighted points (×0.40): — / 40

Comments on Scientific Content (Section A)

B — Editorial Standards

Editorial Standards

30 pts max ▲

#	Criterion	Score (0–10)
B1	Structure & organisation (Structure & Organization)
B2	Qualité linguistique — français (French Language Quality)
B3	Qualité linguistique — anglais (English Language Quality)
B4	Tableaux, figures, équations (Tables, Figures, Equations)
B5	Références & bibliographie (References & Bibliography)
B6	Résumé / Abstract (Abstract)

Section B raw total (out of 60): — / 60

Weighted contribution (×0.500): — / 30

Comments on Editorial Standards (Section B)

C — Scope & Ethics

Scope & Ethics

30 pts max ▲

#	Criterion	Score (0–10)
C1	Pertinence disciplinaire (Disciplinary Relevance)
C2	Originalité & contribution (Originality & Contribution)
C3	Éthique & déclarations obligatoires (Ethics & Mandatory Declarations)
C4	Références & citations (References & Citations)
C5	Limitations reconnues (Recognized Limitations)

Section C raw total (out of 50): — / 50

Weighted contribution (×0.600): — / 30

Comments on Scope & Ethics (Section C)

Review Decision

A — Scientific Content

— / 70

—

of 40 pts

B — Editorial Standards

— / 60

—

of 30 pts

C — Scope & Ethics

— / 50

—

of 30 pts

Total Weighted Score — / 100

— Score required to generate decision

Overall Recommendation & Comments

Ethics Checklist

Funding sources declared

Author has disclosed all sources of financial support

Conflict of interest declared

All conflicts of interest are disclosed per journal policy

IRB / Ethics committee approval

Human or animal subjects have ethics approval documentation

Informed consent obtained

Participants have provided written informed consent

Reviewer Declaration

Name (print)

Date

Institution